Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your The Lancet shopping experience:
1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the The Lancet offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of The Lancet at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.
2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about
3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a The Lancet? Wrong! If the The Lancet is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.
4. Questions - Got a question about The Lancet then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....
5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling The Lancet? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about The Lancet and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.
6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your The Lancet wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.
7. Feedback - happy with your The Lancet then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.
8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the The Lancet site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site
9. Contact - got a question about The Lancet, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.
10. Payment - ready to pay for your The Lancet, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.
{{Infobox Journal| title = The Lancet| cover = | discipline = peer-reviewed
medical journal| country = [UK| history = founded
1823 [medical journals in the world, published weekly by Elsevier, part of Reed Elsevier. It was founded in
1823 by
Thomas Wakley, who named it after the surgical instrument called a lancet, as well as an arched window ("to let in light").
The
as of 2005 editor-in-chief is Richard Horton.
The Lancet takes a stand on several important medical issues - recent examples include criticism of the
World Health Organization, rejecting the efficacy of
homeopathy as a therapeutic option and its disapproval of Reed Elsevier's links with the arms industry.
Impact
The Lancet has a significant readership throughout the world with a high impact factor. It publishes original research articles, review articles ("seminars" and "reviews"), editorials, book reviews, correspondences, amidst other regulars such as news features and case reports.
The Lancet is considered to be one of the "core" general medical journals, the others being the
New England Journal of Medicine, the
Journal of the American Medical Association, and the
British Medical Journal.
The Lancet's impact factor is currently ranked #2 among general medical journals (click here for impact factor rankings).
Journals family
The Lancet has now given birth to a few sub-speciality journals, all bearing the parent title -
The Lancet Neurology (
neurology),
The Lancet Oncology (
oncology) and
The Lancet Infectious Diseases (
infectious diseases). All of them have established significant reputations as medical journals, though most started out publishing only review articles.
Volume renumbering
Prior to 1990,
Lancet had volume numbering that reset every year. Issues in January to June were in volume
i, with the rest in volume
ii. In 1990,
Lancet moved to a sequential volume numbering scheme, with two volumes per year. Volumes were retro-actively assigned to the years prior to 1990, with the first issue of 1990 being assigned volume 335, and the last issue of 1989 assigned volume 334. The table of contents listing on Science Direct uses this new numbering scheme.
Controversial articles
The Lancet was severely criticized after it published a paper in 1998, in which the authors linked the MMR vaccine with
autism. In February 2004
The Lancet published a partial retraction of the paper (
Lancet 2004;363:750). Dr Horton went on the record to say the paper had "fatal conflicts of interest" because one of the authors had a serious conflict of interest that he had not declared to
The Lancet .
The Lancet published a controversial estimate of the Iraq war's Iraqi death toll--around one hundred thousand--in 2004. In 2006 a followup study by the same team suggested that the violent death rate in Iraq was not only consistent with the earlier estimate, but had increased considerably in the intervening period (
Lancet surveys of mortality before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq). The second survey estimated that there had been 654,965 excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war. The 95%
confidence interval was 392,979 to 942,636. 1849 households that contained 12,801 people were surveyed.
In January 2006, it was revealed that data had been fabricated in an article by the Norwegian cancer researcher
Jon Sudbø and 13 co-authors published in
The Lancet in October 2005 . The fabricated article was entitled "Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of oral cancer: a nested case-control study". . Within a week after this scandal surfaced in the news, the high-impact
New England Journal of Medicine published an expression of editorial concern regarding another research paper published on a similar topic in the journal.
See also
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Journal of the American Medical Association
- British Medical Journal
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- List of medical journals
External links
- The Lancet
- 2007 Impact factors of top medical journals, The Lancet's impact factor ranked #3 in General Medicine
- briandeer.com - 'Brian Deer: The Lancet scandal' (MMR)
{{Infobox Journal| title = The Lancet| cover = | discipline =
peer-reviewed medical journal| country = [UK| history = founded
1823 [medical journals in the world, published weekly by Elsevier, part of
Reed Elsevier. It was founded in 1823 by Thomas Wakley, who named it after the surgical instrument called a lancet, as well as an arched window ("to let in light").
The as of 2005 editor-in-chief is Richard Horton.
The Lancet takes a stand on several important medical issues - recent examples include criticism of the World Health Organization, rejecting the efficacy of
homeopathy as a therapeutic option and its disapproval of Reed Elsevier's links with the arms industry.
Impact
The Lancet has a significant readership throughout the world with a high impact factor. It publishes original research articles, review articles ("seminars" and "reviews"), editorials, book reviews, correspondences, amidst other regulars such as news features and case reports.
The Lancet is considered to be one of the "core" general medical journals, the others being the
New England Journal of Medicine, the
Journal of the American Medical Association, and the
British Medical Journal.
The Lancet's impact factor is currently ranked #2 among general medical journals (click here for impact factor rankings).
Journals family
The Lancet has now given birth to a few sub-speciality journals, all bearing the parent title -
The Lancet Neurology (neurology),
The Lancet Oncology (
oncology) and
The Lancet Infectious Diseases (infectious diseases). All of them have established significant reputations as medical journals, though most started out publishing only review articles.
Volume renumbering
Prior to 1990,
Lancet had volume numbering that reset every year. Issues in January to June were in volume
i, with the rest in volume
ii. In 1990,
Lancet moved to a sequential volume numbering scheme, with two volumes per year. Volumes were retro-actively assigned to the years prior to 1990, with the first issue of 1990 being assigned volume 335, and the last issue of 1989 assigned volume 334. The table of contents listing on Science Direct uses this new numbering scheme.
Controversial articles
The Lancet was severely criticized after it published a paper in 1998, in which the authors linked the
MMR vaccine with
autism. In February 2004
The Lancet published a partial retraction of the paper (
Lancet 2004;363:750). Dr Horton went on the record to say the paper had "fatal conflicts of interest" because one of the authors had a serious conflict of interest that he had not declared to
The Lancet .
The Lancet published a controversial estimate of the Iraq war's Iraqi death toll--around one hundred thousand--in 2004. In 2006 a followup study by the same team suggested that the violent death rate in Iraq was not only consistent with the earlier estimate, but had increased considerably in the intervening period (Lancet surveys of mortality before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq). The second survey estimated that there had been 654,965 excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war. The 95% confidence interval was 392,979 to 942,636. 1849 households that contained 12,801 people were surveyed.
In January 2006, it was revealed that data had been fabricated in an article by the Norwegian cancer researcher
Jon Sudbø and 13 co-authors published in
The Lancet in October 2005 . The fabricated article was entitled "Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of oral cancer: a nested case-control study". . Within a week after this scandal surfaced in the news, the high-impact
New England Journal of Medicine published an expression of editorial concern regarding another research paper published on a similar topic in the journal.
See also
External links
- The Lancet
- 2007 Impact factors of top medical journals, The Lancet's impact factor ranked #3 in General Medicine
- briandeer.com - 'Brian Deer: The Lancet scandal' (MMR)
The Lancet Blog
The recent launch of The Lancet Who Counts? Series on civil registration was no less worthy of press coverage than any other Series which we have published, but it went unreported ...
For full text of this paper please go to
For full text of this paper please go to http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60787-9
BBC NEWS | Health | Beer 'may be good for you'
While the health benefits of red wine have long been touted by scientists, a letter in medical journal The Lancet suggests that the odd pint may also be a good idea.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Iraq death toll 'soared post-war'
The Lancet published research by scientists from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in the US city of Baltimore. They gathered data on births and deaths since ...
The Lancet - Elsevier
International Editor/Publisher: R. Horton See editorial board for all editors information Description The Lancet is the world's leading independent general medical journal.
The Lancet Student
James Orbinski’s new book ‘ An Imperfect Offering’. James accepted the 1999 Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of MSF and has worked in conflicts in D.R.C, Somalia and Rwanda ...
Welcome to lancet.co.uk
lancet.co.uk | Search for everything lancet related
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
MECHANISMS OF DISEASE 572 THE LANCET • Vol 359 • February 16, 2002 • www.thelancet. com Background New technologies for the detection of early-stage ovarian cancer are ...
This paper has now been published in the print journal. For full text ...
This paper has now been published in the print journal. For full text please go to http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17441-2